NFL
masonh079• 3 mo agoThe Seattle Seahawks have ONE loss since Week 5.
✅ Win against JAX
✅ Win against HOU
✅ Win against WSH
✅ Win against ARI
❌ Loss against LAR (21-19)
✅ Win against TEN
✅ Win against MIN
✅ Win against ATL
✅ Win against IND
Front-runners in the NFC?
222
98
83Hot Takes
PaysenAE• 3 mo ago
We lost to the Rams, who lost to the Panthers, who lost to the Saints, so OBVIOUSLY the Saints are the front runners.155
9616
gmuney20• 3 mo ago
how would they be front runner if they lost to the only team ahead of them
98205
deeppass• 3 mo ago
Notice how almost all the wins are against sucky teams. They played the Jags and Texans who at the time weren’t the teams they were now, and the rest are bottom feeders29
136
Longwood69• 3 mo ago
No scientist but the team that beat the Seahawks and has the same record or better is probably the front runner
135
MAGA24• 3 mo ago
The mighty ones will get the sweep this Thursday
🐏 🏠6
4
3
trstyhwh• 3 mo ago
Keep in mind, they’ve been able to win or keep games close those past games even when Darnold is playing terrible. Seahawks are dangerous.21
41
49ERSBALLIN• 3 mo ago
9ers is taking the WEST!64
nighthawkjeremy• 3 mo ago
About to lose to the Rams again 🐏71
1
LordThrashmouth• 3 mo ago
amazing how they get looked at as massively bettwr than the broncos
51
go23blue97• 3 mo ago
674
2Other Topics
NFL
rydollaz1• 1 hr ago.@minakimes on Justin Fields to the Chiefs:
"This is a low-risk signing for the Chiefs & an opportunity for him to pursue the Sam Darnold path. The year he spent in San Francisco before getting to the Vikings... that's what Fields can look at this as.
I love it for both sides."
85
1
NFL
masonh079• 2 hr agoBrock Purdy
Christian McCaffrey
Mike Evans
Ricky Pearsall
Christian Kirk
George Kittle (when he’s back)
not bad
842617NFL
masonh079• 2 hr agoYES OR NO - Will AJ Brown play for the Eagles this season?
NoDownload to vote!
YesDownload to vote!
73
3NFL
kimena• 3 hr agoYou know this has always bugged me.
There's been 60 Super Bowls since 1967, and there are 32 teams. So, on average, teams still would have less than two wins (1.875) if wins were uniformly distributed (which we shouldn't expect anyway.) There just simply aren't enough Super Bowls to hold that against most teams.
Like, some of these teams have existed a far shorter time than the Super Bowl itself.
Texans, Browns, Titans, Ravens, Panthers, Jags... all about 30 years or less.
AKA, we should *expect* them to have no Super Bowl wins on average
So, who deserves to be made fun of?
The Arizona Cardinals.
They're the oldest team (1920), had as much opportunity as anyone, even more than most since they were around before any expansions, and STILL, only won a championship back in 1947. Even Detroit has 4 of those.
11751
41