Curious on peoples strategy when drafting rookies in a scenario where you really only need/want a position or two. ex. I have the 1.08 2.02 2.08 2.10 and my needs are RB. I will take a RB with the 1.08 as I expect at least one of the top 5 to be there. Let's say when it comes to my 2nd rd picks and the rookie rankings have the next rb rated 6 picks away. Do people just take the RB and reach a little, take best available player, or take risks and try to trade down?

FF Advice

RagingUmbi

• 1d

Curious on peoples strategy when drafting rookies in a scenario where you really only need/want a position or two. ex. I have the 1.08 2.02 2.08 2.10 and my needs are RB. I will take a RB with the 1.08 as I expect at least one of the top 5 to be there. Let's say when it comes to my 2nd rd picks and the rookie rankings have the next rb rated 6 picks away. Do people just take the RB and reach a little, take best available player, or take risks and try to trade down?

Hot Takes

NZek• 1d

Draft best available, trade for need. I got burned by not doing that last year and I definitely won’t make that mistake again. I was set at WR, but needed an RB so I reached for Brooks when there were still way better WR options last on the table. Could have flipped a wr for a top rb later if I needed.