Rachaad white or Isiah Pacheco?

White could actually lose some passing work to Bucky. End of the day he has added competition. In KC, chiefs let McKinnon walk and brought in nobody. If anything we’re also seeing increased competition for white and decreased for Pacheco. Receiving work is probably similar between them, and Pacheco has the advantage on the ground by a lot

@jimmikmik I guess no matter what I say you will be the contrarian in this thread. Tampa Bay and Cohen had the opportunity draft Ray Davis who he made into a very effective rb that profiles similar to White. They passed. Irving is a gadget 10 touch or less guy. Every rb has a backup. Irving is whites if he can beat out Edmonds. And I agree White might lose some touches this season but not in the pass game work. That’s his elite trait. Why would you as a play caller take that away? 20 more receptions for 300 more yards than Pacheco.

Pacheco also missed 3 games, so he had more receiving work partially because he had more games played

And again, Bucky is the new #2. I never implied he’d overtake White

And Bucky is a legit pass catcher

@jimmikmik I think I mentioned they went with Bucky over Davis.

White was an absolute workhorse because they had literally nobody else, now they have Bucky

I get it you prefer Pacheco.

They got the guy they want to play complementary football to White

Same could be said about Pacheco. Kelce missed time and all they had was Rashee.

Added WR competition isn’t added RB competition lmao

You think Worthy is gonna take snaps away from Pacheco? Lol

The only reason white was great for fantasy was because he was the unquestioned workhorse. And now they go get a solid pass catching rb to bring in to take some work off of him, where they do the opposite in KC and are looking like they’ll use Pacheco even more

@jimmikmik I was referring to you saying that was all they had. I think Tampas wrs are superior to The chiefs this season last season. Pacheco had to compete with the same caliber player in McKinnon as white did with Edmonds. Mckinnon was injured. Which made Pacheco Defacto workhorse. Unless I am watching wrong season.

@jimmikmik if you had White and were going to pursue Pacheco how much would you add to White to get Pacheco? What’s the value difference?

And actually, in the 4 games McKinnon missed, Pacheco averaged 4.75 receptions per game. That’s an 81 reception pace for the full season which greatly outpaced White

@OldeManStrength

So I mean if we want to talk about receiving work, based on that small sample Pacheco has the clear higher ceiling

And again, White has added backfield competition and will likely lose some snaps and work

@jimmikmik what’s the value difference? For the OP I think he wants to know. I said it’s pretty close. You said Pacheco easily. How much does Easily cost?

Depends on the league lmao

Considering there are people out there who prefer white, seems like you could flip him one for one to the right owner

So fairly close. And thanks for the spirited conversation. @jimmikmik