Ekeler or bijan?

I mean again you’re just making a claim the falcons don’t produce

But they do?

Do we remember years of great success from Freeman and Coleman?

There’s always value in the falcons backfield basically every year for the last decade almost. But one year last year of no RB1 and now let’s fade Bijan for the situation? I just don’t get it

Im sure you dont have any unpopular fantasy takes

I’m sure I do but I try to give valid reasons behind them

If my reason arent valid i dont know what to tell you man

What is your main reason?

Because he’s a rookie?

No that’s not valid lol we have a track record to prove it

Because of situation? 1. Situations change 2. It’s not even a bad situation

Huh?

Your reason for fading bijan. You know…what this whole thread is about

What is your main reason for ___?

Youre acting like i said hes a 4th rounder

You said Bijan isn’t even close to Ekeler

And I’m confused as to how that can be said

You said “If my reason arent valid i dont know what to tell you man” and I asked what your reason is

I happen to be high on ekeler and low on bijan

And in the 1st round the threshold of “not close” is much tighter

They will both be RB1s

But I wouldn’t even think about taking bijan if ekeler is on the board

It’s fair enough to want Ekeler over Bijan but just to say not close is crazy still