Ekeler or bijan?

Because he’s a rookie?

No that’s not valid lol we have a track record to prove it

Because of situation? 1. Situations change 2. It’s not even a bad situation

Your reason for fading bijan. You know…what this whole thread is about

What is your main reason for ___?

Youre acting like i said hes a 4th rounder

You said Bijan isn’t even close to Ekeler

And I’m confused as to how that can be said

You said “If my reason arent valid i dont know what to tell you man” and I asked what your reason is

I happen to be high on ekeler and low on bijan

And in the 1st round the threshold of “not close” is much tighter

They will both be RB1s

But I wouldn’t even think about taking bijan if ekeler is on the board

It’s fair enough to want Ekeler over Bijan but just to say not close is crazy still

I see them as neck and neck

Bijans upside would be close to ekelers proven stats. Typically both are going first round, and I don’t like to gamble that much on a first rounder. - give me something proven and repeatable

This is fun to read.

I’m saying Bijan, Don’t try to argue. Bijan worth every penny of a 6-8th pick

Bijan is creeping up the draft boards. Next week it will be Bijan 1.01 posts

Maybe Bijan is the next Ekeler but nobody knows for sure. I’d take the tried and true Ekeler with the track record.

Last I checked the 32nd pick is outside the top 10 but I could be wrong

I was talking ADP

Fair enough