Hi all, hoping to get some feedback on a recent trade in our league. A rebuilding team traded Brandon Aubrey (K) to a contending team for Malik Washington (WR). Our league wants to put it up for veto, so my question is: is this trade objectively unfair, and does it have the potential to disrupt league parity? Thank you!

Let me guess everyone complaining has a worse kicker?

Absolutly dumbest trade ever. Aubrey is gold. If you were dumb enought to do it...I'd let it slide. I've never actually been passionate about a kicker trade, but this one is dumb. You have a guy that is probably going to nail a 70 yard FG this season and guarantees you double digits every week...for a nobody. Plus, it's DYNASTY!!! Kickers kick into their 40s.

This trade isn't worth all this talk, let alone a veto. Carry on.

Who the hell is Malik Washington!?!?

This trade was also done with the intentions of reducing max PF for the team that traded away Aubrey. It makes sense in that aspect - but the haul returned is the issue IMO

You are doing fantasy football wrong if you think there should be parity amongst all the teams. The goal is always to create a better team than everyone else.

Interesting. You don’t see many kicker trades.

But who's Malik Washington though. Who cares about this trade? Lmfao

There’s always 12 startable kickers… if Washington steps into that slot role next year on that offence and is the main returner look out

Bad trade but not worth a veto imo

Bad trades don’t deserve a veto

Everyone saying Aubrey is amazing values kickers way too much. He’s good, but Any kicker can do well for you given the matchup. They aren’t worth anything. Trade not unfair nor veteoable.

It is the responsibility of the commish to talk to both team managers involved, ask why they made the trade and why they thought it is/was fair. Coming makes a decision based off what those team managers say. Other team managers in the league don’t get a vote or a say past asking the commish to look into it.

I don't see a problem with the trade, in dynasty you're making future bets every time. As a commissioner tho your sole responsibility is to prevent collusion. That's it. If a trade is lopsided, I'd want to know who sent it. If the guy on the losing side sent it, he's gotta eat it, and if he didn't I'd give him the option to back out if they both want it the only way you can veto it is collusion. Not the commissioners job to make sure trades are even