🚨Trade Veto🚨 SF 1.75 TEP 12 Team A manager sent a 2025 2nd (playoff 2nd) for Hunter Henry. His only TE is Ertz. The trade got vetoed because of an “overpay” for Henry. Should this have been vetoed? Yes or no.

If it’s clear collusion then the commish can step in. Dumb trade but it’s not collusion

Vetoes should not be a thing unless there is clear collusion

Ridiculous

That would make me want to quit the league. If something that small causes a veto, what kind of league do they want to be. Super lame. Vetos should be an option unless there's clear collusion or if it's a longtime vet taking advantage of a rookie leaguemate

Vetoes shouldn’t be an option end of story. It’s not up to the rest of the league to determine how other players value certain guys. Clear collusion is an easy commish fix.

but dude we're on the same page here: Vetos are lame and this one specifically is really lame

You right

It falls under the concept of an experienced player taking advantage of someone that doesn’t know what they’re doing. Its allowed

Absolutely ridiculous

He TE 14 w a young and up and coming qb

He may end up top 10

Vetos are weak shit