“Former Steelers’ RB Le’Veon Bell plans to sign with…the New York Jets, a league source tells ESPN”

The guy lost big time at least now no RB will attempt that again

@SamIAmC6 that's wrong. He was not Guaranteed 33M

Ok I’m wrong and every analyst is wrong but ur right @jlcon07 my fault

He was guaranteed 10M. There was "likely" to be earned money in year 2 where you can call that money in guarantees and that total was 33M over 2 years. But the team if they had cut him after year 1 would have paid him 17M and nothing after

Sam yes I mentioned this to them. I called the headline misleading and inaccurate

I have links to prove it

Best case would have been to play last year and collect the 14.5 and then go sign the shitty jets contract and get ur 35

Clearly teams didn’t like that he sat out

@jlcon07 is a Cowboys fan, so he'd know a thing or 2 abt bad contracts brah

Hear him out

(jk I 3 u jl)

Lol 😂

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.sbnation.com/platform/amp/nfl/2018/7/18/17585956/leveon-bell-contract-steelers-offer-guaranteed-money-free-agency

Oh absolutely. That's why I can identify a bad contract when I see one.

Lmao 😂 cheers to that we can argue all day on Lbell knows if he’s happy or not

Well he got his security. Less AAV then I'm sure he wanted so I wouldn't say he's happy. But the talking point was about the difference between this contract and the Steelers.

Well... there goes the hype for his shit record... damn..

I’m fine without him glad he lost some money in the deal for being a punk but otherwise we move on

AB on the other hand was a horrible deal that guy really screwed us

If a player wants to screw the system they should take notes from AB he got us good

Btw. I don't think the Steelers should have paid bell. They were right to offer the contract the way (year to year essentially) they did for a soon to be 27 yr old RB. But I do understand why it meant bell wouldn't take it.

Fair

Booo, go back to arguing